USPTO serial 79163445
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman & Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric machines for mixing, kneading, pulping, grinding, mincing, chopping, blending, beating and shredding foodstuffs, namely, electric food mixers and electric food processors; electric machines for peeling vegetables, namely, electric vegetable peelers; electric machines for making and mixing beverages, namely, beverage processing machines, non-aerated beverage making machines, aerated beverage making machines; kitchen machines in the nature of electric mixers, namely, electric mixing machines for making ice cream or sorbets; electric food processors, namely, electric food liquidisers; electric food blenders; electric food processors; electric juice extractors; electric coffee grinders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |