USPTO serial 79163932
BABOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Dance schools; live dance exhibitions; educational services relating to dancing; dance club services; dance hall services; organization of dancing events; provision of dance classes; provision of facilities for dancing; dance studios; organisation of dancing competitions; presentation of dancing displays; organisation of dancing displays; exercise fitness training services; physical education services; keep fit instructions; physical training services; fitness club services; conducting fitness classes; personal trainer services fitness training; tuition in physical fitness; exercise instruction; educational services relating to physical fitness; sports and fitness; health club services health and fitness training; club discotheque services; entertainment services provided at discotheques | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |