Drawing for ARNEST

USPTO serial 79164247

ARNEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4843479Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 2015
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ARNEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Passler

Mark D. Passler Blank Rome222 Lakeview Avenue, 14th FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cookery molds, namely, rice ball molds [ and sushi molds; plastic cookery molds for making sandwiches ]; cookery molds for making edible rice plates, bowls and cups; cookery press-out molds for dried seaweed; [ cooking molds for food cutting; ] cooking graters; [ oiling brushes for cooking; ] cooking spoons; cooking utensils, namely, spatulas [, turners; pepper pots; sugar bowls; salt shakers ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 29, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 7, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 7, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 5, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 13, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 4, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 20, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 20, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 20, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 3, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 3, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 7, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance