USPTO serial 79164275
GINSENG BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUIGLEY, LINDA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GINSENG BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Aromatherapy services; beauty salons; hairdressing salons; nail care services, namely, manicure services, pedicure services and artificial nail services; hand and foot massage services; health spa services; cosmetic skin care services; advisory services relating to nail care services and cosmetic skin care services; depilatory waxing services; hair implantation; sauna services; solarium services; visagist's services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |