USPTO serial 79164419
MOTOZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTOZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen M. Walsh
KRISTEN M WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLP1300 CLINTON SQUAREROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services namely, online retail store services relating to articles of protective clothing for wear by motorcyclists, and for wear by riders of motor sport and power sport vehicles, namely, quad bikes, over water crafts and vehicles and snowmobiles for protection against accident or injury, articles of protective clothing, namely, protective visors, back pads, wrist pads, elbow pads, knee pads, shoulder pads, full upper body protectors, lumber protectors, protective jackets, protective trousers, protective gloves, protective boots, bags and cases for helmets and visors, helmets for motorcyclists and for riders of motor sport and power sport vehicles, namely, quad bikes, over water crafts and vehicles and snowmobiles, LED traffic signals, speedometers and speedometer converters, battery chargers, electric locks for motorcycles and for motor sport and power sport vehicles, namely, quad bikes, over water crafts and vehicles and snowmobiles, sunglasses, sun visors, motorcycle lights, lights for motor sport and power sport vehicles, namely, quad bikes, over water crafts and vehicles and snowmobiles, motorcycle, quad bike parts, over water craft, overwater vehicles and snowmobile parts, fittings, and accessories, namely, gears, seats, seat covers, handle bars, handle covers, mirrors, luggage racks, turn signals, wheels, tires, tire levers, valve caps, luggage nets, cargo nets, handlebar straps, license plate brackets, handlebar grips and end caps, handlebar ends, horns, wheel and disc locks, bags and cases adapted for use on a motorcycle, quad bike, overwater craft, overwater vehicle and snowmobile, motorcycle bags, namely, tank bags, saddle bags, and sissy bags, parts and fittings for motorcycles, quad bikes, overwater crafts, overwater vehicles and snowmobiles namely, structural parts therefor, all-purpose bags, sports bags, saddle bags, bags and cases adapted for use on a motorcycle, holdalls, luggage, luggage straps, umbrellas, clothing, namely, trousers, t-shirts, sweat shirts, pants, jackets, coats, socks, sweaters, cardigans, gloves, jeans, face masks, balaclavas, scarves, snoods, neck warmers, waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof over-suits, waterproof over-boots and waterproof gloves, suits and race suits for use in motor sports and power sports, headwear, footwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 10, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |