Drawing for BETABIND

USPTO serial 79164573

BETABIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4920147Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 22, 2016
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETABIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives and natural additives in the nature of additive substances derived from root crops and root vegetables for industrial purposes, in particular, for improving the properties and processing of paper and cardboard, for improving the capacity of water bonding and for improving the absorption and elimination of mineralsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 27, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 11, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 7, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 7, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 22, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 22, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance