USPTO serial 79164786
FLORETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLORETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried, cooked and deep-frozen fruit and beverages; mixed fruit and vegetable salads; ready-to-use-mixed fruit and vegetable salads; ready-to-use mixed salads; preparations for making soups, namely potages; prepared ready-to-fry vegetables; prepared ready-to-cook vegetables; prepared, ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of vegetables; prepared, ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of fruits; processed fruits and vegetables, namely, julienne of vegetables and fruits; snack foods based mainly on fruits; snack foods based mainly on vegetables; prepared or processed edible seeds; ready-to-use-snacks of mixed fruit and ready-to-use snacks of vegetable salads; all the foregoing excluding vegetables in fresh or processed form that occur in the shape of florettes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Salad dressings; preserved garden herbs for use as seasonings; seaweed for use as a condiment; croutons used for garnishing soups and salads; preserved aromatic herbs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit and vegetables; fresh fruit and vegetables, namely, appetizer trays containing fresh fruit, and appetizer trays containing fresh vegetables; fresh aromatic herbs; algae for human consumption; and fresh lettuce; all the foregoing excluding vegetables in fresh or processed form that occur in the shape of florettes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |