USPTO serial 79164869
PROJECT FLOORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROJECT FLOORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devasena Reddy
Devasena Reddy HM LAW GROUP LLP19925 Stevens Creek BlvdSuite 100Cupertino, CA 95014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials and building elements (non-metallic); parts and accessories for all aforementioned goods, as far as contained in this class; planks; tiles; wooden floors; floor boards (of wood); laminate floors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings, artificial ground coverings; wall and ceiling coverings; parts and accessories for all aforementioned goods, as far as contained in this class; carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials for covering existing floors; wall hangings (non-textile); plastic floor coverings, in particular in form of tiles and planks; vinyl and linoleum floor coverings, in particular in form tiles and planks; resilient floor coverings, in particular in form of tiles and planks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Commercial trading and consumer information services, namely, retail und wholesale services, also provided via Internet and online shops for the aforesaid goods from classes 19 and 27 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |