USPTO serial 79165036
STARTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Hyman
JONATHAN A HYMAN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Delivery services, namely, home delivery services and door to door delivery services, namely, delivering parcels and mail similar to mail services from United States Postal Service | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |