Drawing for MCI

USPTO serial 79165097

MCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4970914Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 7, 2016
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith W. Medansky

Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper LLP (US)P.O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical drive mechanisms for operating car mirrors and flaps of vehicle radiator grillesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for operating car mirrors and flaps of vehicle radiator grillesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Car mirrors, namely, rearview mirrors and side mirrors, and structural parts therefor; Radiator grilles for vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 23, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 7, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance