Drawing for STRIIMCAST

USPTO serial 79165112

STRIIMCAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRIIMCAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction or processing sound or images, namely, audio, video or audio-video apparatus, USB flash drives, HDMI flash drives; loudspeakers for audio, audio-video and computer apparatus; compact disks (audio-video); equipment for data processing and computers; software (recorded programs); computer peripherals, namely, screens, keyboards, mice, loudspeakers, adapters, printers; network adapterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 27, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance