Drawing for VITALCARE

USPTO serial 79165242

VITALCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITALCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair lotions; preparations for hair styling and hair care; shampoos; hair conditioners; hair styling waxes; hair dyes; cosmetics preparations for hair; hair protection creams; hair oil in drops; hair balms; hair styling gels; hair sprays; hair styling foams; oils for hair; hair lacquers; hair mascara; sunscreen hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 4, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance