Drawing for CLAIR

USPTO serial 79165306

CLAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disinfectants for hygienic purposes; fungicidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 17, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 3, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 18, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 13, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 3, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 11, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance