Drawing for NINO-ROBOTICS

USPTO serial 79165578

NINO-ROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4934563Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 2016
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINO-ROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy Sabarra

Nancy Sabarra FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Apparatus for locomotion by land, namely, wheelchairs and motorized wheelchairsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 13, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 24, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 28, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 12, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 12, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 3, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance