Drawing for NOGLU

USPTO serial 79165625

NOGLU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOGLU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Nowak

Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars and processed cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery made of sugar, edible ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces for use as condiments; spices; ice for refreshment; sandwiches, pizzas; pancakes; cookies; cakes; rusks; sugar confectionery; chocolate; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; tea-based beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; bar services; food and drink catering; gluten-free food provisionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 6, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 18, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2016CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance