USPTO serial 79165764
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Snacks, namely, dried, roasted, salted, fried, extruded and/or spiced peanut kernels, nuts, almonds and cashew nut kernels, potato chips, potato sticks; potato snacks; deep-fried potato snacks; dips; snacks made from extruded potato products | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Confectioneries; baked goods, namely, shortbread, shortbread pastries, wafer, savoury, pretzel, onion and cheese biscuits, waffles, wafers, biscuits, rusks, gingerbread and honey cake, crackers, ready-to-eat baked goods for toasting, namely, savoury sandwich biscuits; pop corn, corn flakes; sauces; snacks made from extruded wheat, rice and corn products; corn snacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |