Drawing for O'CLOCK

USPTO serial 79165770

O'CLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with O'CLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

Boris Umansky Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fresh or frozen prepared dishes based on meat, fish, crustaceansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages; beverages based on fruit and fruit juicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; food and drink catering; bars; cafes, tea roomsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 8, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 4, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 30, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance