Drawing for HK MAN

USPTO serial 79166008

HK MAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HK MAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; underwear; underclothing; vests; singlets; nightwear; sleepwear; pyjamas; lounging pants and tops; bath robes; dressing gowns; boxer shorts; briefs; hosiery for men; socks; jockstraps (underwear); underwear for sports useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 12, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 15, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 30, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance