Drawing for MERYL THERMOLOFT

USPTO serial 79166233

MERYL THERMOLOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERYL THERMOLOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textiles and textile goods not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Ready-made clothingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance