Drawing for SPLASH M-KNIFE

USPTO serial 79166406

SPLASH M-KNIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4970932Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 7, 2016
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLASH M-KNIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shauna M. Wertheim

Shauna M. Wertheim The Marbury Law Group, PLLC11800 Sunrise Valley Drive15th FloorReston, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Endoscopes for medical purposes; endoscopic video processors for medical purposes; endoscopic light source units for medical purposes; endoscopic air supply pump devices for medical purposes; endoscopic water supply pump devices for medical purposes; endoscopic forceps plug for medical purposes; carrying cases for endoscopes for medical purposes; endoscopic treatment tools for medical purposes, namely, biopsy forceps, high frequency knife for endoscopes, basket forceps, injection needles; endoscopic washer for cleaning endoscopes; cleaning brushes for endoscopes for medical purposes; carrying carts for endoscopes for medical purposes; endoscopic cameras for medical purposes; foot switches for endoscopes for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 1, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 12, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 7, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance