Drawing for Serial No. 79166626

USPTO serial 79166626

Serial No. 79166626

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5024422Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 23, 2016
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with Serial No. 79166626?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 9000Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, saws, nippers, pliers, cutting pliers, round nose pliers with side cutters, plastic cutters, [ paper cutters, cloth cutters, vinyl cutters, ] cardboard cutters, [ pincers, putty knives; ] nipper cases, nipper stands; bladed or pointed hand tools, namely, [ border shears, metal-cutting scissors, tin shears, ] nail clippers, carving knives, manual drills, hand-operated files, hand-operated metal files; [ reamers; hoes; spades; rakes; ] tweezers [ ; non-electric egg slicers; sugar tongs; non-electric planes for flaking dried bonito blocks (Katsuo-bushi planes); non-electric can openers; nutcrackers; spoons; non-electric cheese slicers; non-electric pizza cutters; forks; palette knives; kitchen knives ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 27, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 2, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 12, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 16, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 25, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 23, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 23, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Feb 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance