Drawing for MENARDI

USPTO serial 79166656

MENARDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5056656Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 2016
Examiner
REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MENARDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Kreider Gaunt

Karen Kreider Gaunt Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Filters for industrial purposes, namely, pressure filters, vacuum filters, candle filters, centrifuges, filter presses, fabric filters, pressure leaf filters, dual belt filter presses, horizontal filters, horizontal pan filters, and vertical disc filters, for machines, processing machines and process line machines in the boiler, power generation, waste incineration, carbon black, chemical, food, metal and rock product industries; rotary vacuum drum filters for machines in the pharmaceutical processing, chemical processing, food processing and industrial liquid filtration industries; valves as machine components; valves and filters being parts of processing and process line machinesACTIVE—
016[ filter paper ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024Felt cloth used for making filters; woven fiberglass used for making filters; cotton fabrics used in making filters; polyester fabrics used in making filters; polymer fabrics used in making filters; synthetic fibers used in making filters; non-woven fiberglass used in making filtersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 29, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 19, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 5, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2022C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 21, 2022EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2022PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Apr 12, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 11, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 4, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance