USPTO serial 79166760
SENSILIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4934590Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2016
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSILIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Blake R. Hartz
Blake R. Hartz Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Hen111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Analysis of remote sensing data with respect to agriculture, namely, analysis of data for field mapping, soil properties, vegetation properties, water properties, plants properties and chemical properties; agricultural research, namely, interpretation of remote sensing data with respect to agriculture; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for analyzing remote sensing data with respect to agriculture; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for interpreting remote sensing data with respect to agriculture | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Agricultural advice services featuring the provision of remote sensing data with respect to agriculture, agrarian lands, and agricultural products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |