USPTO serial 79166920
WERNLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WERNLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randolph E. Digges, III
Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP23755 Lorain Road, Suite 200North Olmsted, OH 44070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish, not live; poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; fruit compotes; compotes; eggs; milk; dairy products, namely, butter, buttermilk, cream, yogurt; edible oils and fats; foodstuffs based on extruded potato products, namely, processed potatoes, potato-based snack foods; dried, roasted, salted and/or spiced potato chips, potato sticks, raisins, hazelnuts, peanuts, cashew nuts, pistachios and almonds, being prepared; dried fruits; vol-au-vent based on fish (not live) or meat; cocktail snacks consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, shellfish, fruit, vegetables, eggs and milk | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee and artificial coffee; tea; cocoa; rice; tapioca; sago; flour; cereal-based snack foods; processed cereals; cereal based energy bars; bread; pastry; confectionery made of sugar and chocolate; biscuits; waffles; long-life pastries; rusks; toast; crisp bread; bread sticks; cookies; Läckerli cookies; chocolates; candy; tartlets; wafer sticks; ice cream cones; puff pastry; meringues; cakes; marzipan; extruded wheat, rice and corn-based snack foods; popcorn; sugar; honey; golden syrup; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; ice for refreshment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |