Drawing for Serial No. 79167219

USPTO serial 79167219

Serial No. 79167219

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79167219?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Holman

John C. Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NW, Ste. 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household and kitchen utensils, namely, serving scoops, spatulas, sieves, strainers, graters and kitchen tongs; containers for kitchen or household use; tableware, other than knives, forks and spoons, namely, scoops, serving forks, serving ladles and serving spoons; dinnerware; tea services being tableware; coffee services being tableware; dishes and plates; beverage glassware and mugs; basins and soup bowls; cookie jars; pots; pitchers; glass jars; earthenware jars; porcelain jars; sugar bowls; pepper pots; salt shakers; flower pots and vases; glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, drinking cups, saucers, serving bowls, and trays; decorative plaques and figurines made of glass, porcelain and earthenwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance