Drawing for SUPERSOL

USPTO serial 79167266

SUPERSOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5102361Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2016
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERSOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tomoko Ishihara

Tomoko Ishihara Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Artificial pumice stone for personal useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Filter components made of foam glass, namely, water filters, water filtration, and purification units, and replacement cartridges and filters therefor used to purify waste water for industrial purposes, namely, water treatment plants, artificial wetland systems; water filter components made of foam glass, namely, water filters, water filtration and purification unites, and replacement cartridges and filters therefor used in septic tanks for industrial purposes, namely, rainwater harvesting systems, storm water storage; water filter components made of foam glass used for water purification units, namely, fish tank water filters for aquafarmingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Powdered or bulk foam glass building or construction materials, namely, foam glass for building, glass bricks, glass powder for building purposes; erosion control mats also integrating plants seeds; building glass; non-metallic minerals, unworked or partly worked for building; thermal insulation materials made of foam glass, namely, insulated glass for building; concrete aggregates; soil conditioning materials made of foam glass for drainage, namely, foam glass for building drainage channels, glass powder for building drainage channels, glass powder made from recycled glass waste for building drainage channels; rooftop or indoor greening foundation material made of foam glass and glass powder mixed with powdery foam glass and soil for building purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 14, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 7, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 7, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 20, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 25, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance