Drawing for COUNTER PLATE JAPAN

USPTO serial 79167284

COUNTER PLATE JAPAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COUNTER PLATE JAPAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pulp making, papermaking or paper-working machines and apparatus; punching dies for punching machines for paper working; punching blades for punching dies for rubber goods manufacturing machines; punching blades for punching dies for metalworking machines; punching blades for punching dies for textile machines; punching blades for punching dies for leather tanning machines; printing or bookbinding machines and apparatus; lumbering, woodworking, or veneer or plywood making machines and apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance