Drawing for HELIEVS

USPTO serial 79167420

HELIEVS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELIEVS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

Timothy H. Hiebert Samuels & Hiebert LLCTwo International Place, 23rd FloorBoston, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Helicopter cockpit instrumentation primarily composed of optical camera, infrared optical sensors and imaging software algorithms that provide enhanced images of relayed scenes in various monitors of a cockpit, enabling operations in low visibility conditionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 25, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 6, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance