Drawing for BELAYA RUS

USPTO serial 79167790

BELAYA RUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELAYA RUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, except beer, including alcoholic beverages containing fruit; aperitifs, included in this class; arak arrack; brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; gin; digesters liqueurs and spirits; cocktails, included in this class; liqueurs; spirits beverages; distilled beverages; hydromel mead; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts, alcoholic; alcoholic essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 15, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance