Drawing for DE GIUSTI

USPTO serial 79167968

DE GIUSTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4911486Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE GIUSTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group330 N. Main St,Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, coffee substitutes, tea, chocolate, cocoa, pastry and confectionery in the nature of confectionary made of sugar, frozen confectionary, cakes, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, bread, pastries, cakes, breadsticks, cereal bars, muffins, cookies; bread, edible ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, [ vinegar, ] sauces, spices, iceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages except beers, wineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 23, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2016COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 26, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 26, 2016LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 19, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance