Drawing for BLITZIMA

USPTO serial 79168157

BLITZIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4962040Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2016
Examiner
CARLSON, KRISTIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLITZIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kisuk Lee

Kisuk Lee Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC7700 Bonhomme, Suite 400St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of inflammations; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of transplant rejection; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of autoimmune disorders; pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 25, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 4, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 9, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 5, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 24, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance