USPTO serial 79168189
PAULIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAULIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches; timepieces; watch straps; leather watch straps; jewellery; jewellery boxes; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |