USPTO serial 79168297
SICPASEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SICPASEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Printing inks, inks with special security features, copying inks, printer's pastes, colorants for all kinds of graphic printing techniques; printing varnishes and lacquers; preparations for safety markings or for visible and invisible markings as well as for coatings and compositions, all made of the above materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic equipment or equipment operating electronically for producing, reading and/or recording security layers and markings or security marks created by printing or otherwise, especially electronic, digital or electrically functioning printers, electronic readers, scanners, surface feelers, apparatus for displaying or reading markings whose frequency lies outside the visible spectrum, appliances for recording markings detected electromagnetically or magnetically | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials (included in this class), especially, bank-notes, tickets, labels, banderoles, financial, fiduciary and fiscal documents, film and plastic sheets for packaging, stationery articles, packaging materials (included in this class) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, especially printing services, digital printing and marking, especially the application of security marks, markings, coatings and compositions for reading and coding to combat counterfeiting of goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Security consulting, especially professional consulting in product security for authenticating and identifying goods as well as the recording and tracking of goods up to their point of sale and beyond | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SICPA HOLDING SA
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SICPASEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |