USPTO serial 79168301
PAPAGAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAPAGAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved meat, shellfish (not live); preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, vegetable juices for cooking; preserved beans, peas, lentils and soya beans; soups; preserved olives, pickles; milk and milk products, namely, milk desserts, yoghurts, drinking yoghurts, mousses, cream (dairy cream), whipped cream, butter, cheese, milk beverages (milk predominating); edible oils and fats; jellies, jams, compotes, marmalades; processed nuts and processed grains, dried fruits, fruit pulps; hazelnut spreads, prepared nuts, processed peanuts, prepared pistachio pastes; eggs, powdered eggs; gelatine for food, jellies for food; protein for human consumption; potato chips, potato crisps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |