Drawing for TWISTAIR

USPTO serial 79168614

TWISTAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWISTAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecelia M. Perry

Cecelia M. Perry McGlew and Tuttle, P.C.Scarborough StationScarborough, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental instruments, namely, hand pieces in the nature of dental turbines and contra-anglesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 8, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 6, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 11, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance