USPTO serial 79168880
VMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5005500Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2016
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-8161 RK Epe, NL
NL-8161 RK Epe, NL
RK Epe, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Sullivan
Todd A. Sullivan Hayes Soloway P.C.175 Canal StreetManchester, NH 03101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, parts of machines, machine tools and machine parts, namely, machines for tire manufacturing, retreading, cutting, extruding, mixing; extruders for tire manufacturing, rubber and plastics industry; machines for product handling in the pharmaceutical, food and personal care industry, namely, machines for sorting and packing pharmaceutical preparations, folding machines for sterile products, [ machines for sorting and packing bread and cookies, machines for packing food products,] machines for producing cosmetic cotton pads, can washers, being machines [ , machines for assembly of components to semi-finished products ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; ] computer software used as, and for use in the design and development of, application software and operating system software, to run on machines; computer software for graphical user interface between human and machine; computer software for universal peripheral interface between machine and overlaying factory control systems in the nature of production planning systems; computer operating systems software; computer control systems software for electronic control for machines used in the tire, rubber, plastics, pharmacy distribution and dispensing, food, personal care industries; computer hardware, excluding optical and surveying instruments; [ computer peripherals adapted for use with computers; [ electronic data loggers; Blank optical data carriers; ] electronic control systems for machines; electric sensors and detector units for use in controlling the actuation and operation of machines; electric or electronic sensors for machines; optical sensors; software featuring universal interface and automated process control systems for machines in the field of the tire, rubber, plastics, pharmacy distribution and dispensing, food and personal care industries; automatic control devices for machines, namely, automated process control systems comprised of logic based computer hardware used to operate manufacturing machines in the tire, rubber, plastics, pharmacy distribution and dispensing, food, personal care industries; [ programmable electronic controllers for machines, excluding gaming apparatus; ] all aforesaid products used for manufacturing machines in the tire, rubber, plastics, pharmacy distribution and dispensing, food, personal care industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of tire manufacturing machines, rubber processing machines, machines for sorting and packing pharmaceutical preparations, folding machines for sterile products, machines for sorting and packing bread and cookies, machines for sorting and packing food products, machines for producing cosmetic cotton pads, can washers, including parts and tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Research and development of machines, parts of machines, machine tools and machine parts; software design and development ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VMI Holland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by VMI Holland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by VMI Holland B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |