Drawing for KODENSHI

USPTO serial 79168956

KODENSHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KODENSHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Diodes; integrated circuits; semi-conductors; semiconductor wafers; transistors; electronic notice boards; portable communications apparatus; solar batteries; electric current control devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 21, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 29, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 16, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance