Drawing for IP-COM

USPTO serial 79169253

IP-COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IP-COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Materials for electricity mains (wires, cables); coaxial cables; computers; electric wires and cables; computer peripheral devices; chips (integrated circuits); data processing apparatus; computer memories; recorded computer programs; mouse (data processing equipment); notebook computers; recorded computer software; couplers (data processing equipment); interfaces (for computers); smart cards (integrated circuit cards); cards (integrated circuits)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance