USPTO serial 79169326
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA,LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Murphy
Jason A. Murphy Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts, LLP22 Century Hill Drive, Suite 302Latham, NY 12110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Handheld apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images of the eye; handheld apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images of the pupil; devices for measuring the eye; devices for measuring reactivity of the eye; devices for measuring pupillary reactivity to stimulus; physical therapy equipment; physiotherapy and rehabilitation equipment; exercise equipment for medical rehabilitation purposes; training aids for medical practitioners | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Machines for physical exercises | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |