USPTO serial 79169397
MADEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MADEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina Arenas Solis
Cristina Arenas Solis Ferraiuoli LLC221 Ponce de Leon Avenue 5th FloorSan Juan, PR 00917UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatuses for heating, refrigerating, drying and ventilating, namely ducts of metal for ventilating and air conditioning installations, ducts of metal for central heating installations; Ceiling diffusers, Linear slot diffusers, Long throw jet, nozzles, Floor diffusers, Ventilation valves, a control panel that manages diffusers to control the angle of air venting from air ventilation ductwork, Air supply grilles, Linear grilles, Linear floor grilles, Return grilles, Transfer grilles, External grilles; Accessories for ducts of metal for ventilating, air conditioning and heating installations, namely dampers, mounting frames and plenum boxes; Terminal units with HEPA filter namely plenum boxes with high-efficiency air filters; Air volume dampers for ducts, Constant air volume dampers, Pressure dampers, Variable air volume dampers, control modules that enable one to set and maintain a constant pressure in an aerobic duct network; Control modules to set and maintain constant air pressure in a duct network; Zoning systems for temperature control in air conditioning and heating installations using ducts, namely a control panel linked with thermostats to operate motorized dampers; Motorized damper for grilles, Motorized plenum box for grilles, Motorized plenum box for diffuser, Motorized damper for ducts; digital thermostats, control boxes for air conditioning systems; Adjustable pressure dampers for ducts; Rectangular fire dampers, Circular fire dampers, Expanding transfer grilles, Rectangular fire dampers, Circular fire dampers, Expanding transfer grilles Fire damper management system, namely a control panel to monitor and control fire dampers in air conditioning ducts, ventilating ducts and heating ducts; active chilled beams, namely air/water induction terminal units that simultaneously provide the supply, thermal treatment and diffusion of supply air, to set internal conditions at the desired comfort levels | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |