Drawing for ELEGANCE

USPTO serial 79169401

ELEGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4911602Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELEGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hair extensions; wigs, elastic tape for use in fixing wigs; wigs; false hair; hair pins for fixing back-hairpieces for use in Japanese hair styling (Tabodome); hairpieces for Japanese hair styling (Kamishin); human hair; synthetic hairpieces; hair pieces; human braiding hair; synthetic braiding hair; hair clamps; hair clips; hair curl clips; claw clips being hair accessories; snap clips being hair accessories; hair ornaments; hair scrunchies; elasticated hair bands; hair grips and slides; hair ornaments not of precious metal; grips for the hair; pins for the hair; toupees being false hair; plaited hair being braids; hair bowsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 23, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance