USPTO serial 79169774
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline Zion
Jacqueline Zion Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP1500 Broadway, 12th FlNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | mineral salt in the nature of alkaline salts such as chloride, oxide, sulfate, silicate and carbonate; aggregates for cement, namely, preservatives for cement, except paints and oils | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | mortar, except repair mortar; cement | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |