USPTO serial 79169779
Serial No. 79169779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4971035Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2016
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79169779?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
Perla M. Kuhn Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for website acceleration and website security; computer software for website acceleration and website security that may be downloaded from a global computer network; computer hardware for upload, storage, retrieval, download, transmission and delivery of digital content; computer network-attached storage (NAS) hardware; computer storage devices, namely blank flash drives | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of website acceleration and website security; industrial research in the field of website acceleration and website security; scientific research and analysis in the field of website acceleration and website security; design and development of computer hardware and software; information technology (IT) consulting services; computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems; computer programming; computer advisory and consultancy services; computer software design, development and engineering; computer system analysis and design; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; cloud computing featuring software for use in website acceleration and website security; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; technical support services, namely, 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; programming of computer software for others; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; design and development of computer hardware in the field of website acceleration and website security; design and development of computer software in the field of website acceleration and website security; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer programming consultancy; hosting an online website for creating and hosting micro websites for businesses | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |