USPTO serial 79169891
ORCHARD THIEVES CIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORCHARD THIEVES CIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine E. Maxson
CATHERINE E MAXSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 THIRD AVESUITE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, ales and beverages made from malt, namely, malt beer; porter; stout; lager; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, mineral and aerated waters, non-alcoholic cider, fruit drinks and fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | hard cider; fruit wine, excluding fruit wine containing grapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2016 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |