Drawing for K-MAX

USPTO serial 79169978

K-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5153078Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2017
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with K-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Ervin

David J. Ervin Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. Box 14300Washington, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps, namely, electric pumps, electric water pumps, wastewater pumps, electric pressure boosting pumps, slurry pumps, drainage pumps, sewage lifting pumps, circulating pumps for cooling and heating fluid, sewage pumps, submersible pumps, centrifugal pumps, condensate pumps, electric explosion-proof pumps, electric oil and chemical pumps for handling aggressive, toxic, explosive, valuable, inflammable, malodorous, and harmful liquids; units comprising pumps and drive motors, namely, electric and hydraulic pumps and electric and hydraulic drive motors for use in the handling of pure, aggressive, clean, and contaminated liquids for use in sewage treatment, power plant, desalination plant, construction site, agriculture, industrial, chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and sprinkler system applications; structural or component parts of electric pumps, electric water pumps, wastewater pumps, electric pressure boosting pumps, slurry pumps, drainage pumps, sewage lifting pumps, circulating pumps for cooling and heating fluid, sewage pumps, submersible pumps, and centrifugal pumps, namely, rotors, bearings, sleeves, shafts, valves, bushings, stuffing boxes, gaskets, bearing rings, wear rings, wear plates, suction nozzles, bearing housings, pump housings, manifolds, guide wheels, and bucket wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 3, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 23, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 7, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 6, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 6, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance