USPTO serial 79170602
LITTLE WHITE LIES...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE WHITE LIES...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Hyman
Jonathan A. Hyman Knobbe Martens Olson and Bear LLP2040 Main Street 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and knitwear, namely, swimwear, loungewear, lingerie, dresses, t-shirts, coats, shorts, trousers, shirts, blouses, skirts, playsuits, dungarees, kimonos, tunics, coats, jackets, raincoats, suits, sweaters, cardigans, jeans, shorts, underwear, pants, bras, hosiery, tights, stockings, socks, vests, pyjamas, dressing gowns; footwear; footwear, namely, boots, shoes, slippers, sandals, sneakers, athletic shoes; headwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps, headbands, berets, scarves, gloves, mittens; belts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, on-line retail store services, and retail store services via a catalogue, in relation to clothing, footwear, headgear, swimwear, loungewear, lingerie, dresses, t-shirts coats, shorts, trousers, shirts, blouses, skirts, playsuits, dungarees, kimonos, tunics, coats, jackets, raincoats, suits, sweaters, knitwear, cardigans, jeans, shorts, underwear, pants, bras, hosiery, tights, stockings, socks, vests, pyjamas, dressing gowns, hats, caps, headbands, berets, scarves, gloves, mittens, boots, shoes, slippers, sandals, trainers, belts, handbags, wallets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |