Drawing for LEOMAX

USPTO serial 79170610

LEOMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEOMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Hynak

Michael J. Hynak Hynak & Associates, PC812 South Courthouse Rd.Arlington, VA 22204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather and goods made of these materials, namely, key cases, boxes of leather, leather straps, purses, wallets not included in other classes, animal skins, animal hides, trunks and travelling bags, umbrellas and parasols, walking sticks, whips, harnesses and saddlery, covers for petsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames, goods of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, namely, hampers in the nature of baskets, non-metal door and window fittings, bins of wood or plastic, curtain rings, non-metal clothes hooks, flower-pot pedestals, mattresses, pads, toppers for beds, neck pillows, pillows, decorative pillowsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Household and kitchen utensils and containers, namely, containers for household or kitchen use, plastic storage containers for household use, spatulas, strainers, cookware, combs and sponges for household purposes, cleaning sponges, toiletry sponges, bath brushes, cosmetic brushes, hair brushes, brush-making materials, articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning cloths, cleaning sponges, cleaning rags, steelwool, unworked or semi-worked glass except glass used in building, beverage glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, porcelain and earthenware ornaments, porcelain and earthenware statues, porcelain and earthenware dishes, bread baskets for domestic useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, fabrics for textile use, namely, curtains of textile, towels, textile tablecloths, bed linen, bed linen sheets, bed covers, covers for chairs, pillows cases, cashmere blankets, decorative pillow cases, duvets, pillow shams; bed covers, table covers, namely, plastic table covers, table linen, table mats not of paperSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Educational services, namely, classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of cooking and business management, providing of training in the field of event design and organization, cooking, business management and computers, entertainment, namely, live musical performances, arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events, sporting and cultural activities, namely, organizing community sporting and cultural events, organization of exhibitions for cultural purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 25, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 4, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 13, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2015CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 23, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 12, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance