Drawing for ELIGO

USPTO serial 79170880

ELIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5038376Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2016
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, molluscs and crustaceans, not live; poultry, game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables, jellies, jams, eggs, milk, dairy products, namely, milk beverages, evaporated and dry milk powder, edible oils and fats, preserved foodstuffs, namely, preserved meats, preserved vegetables, preserved fish, macerated vegetables in vinegarSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 24, 2025Further Decision Processed by IB—
Apr 1, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 24, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 24, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 13, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 20, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 13, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 16, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance