Drawing for NANOLUB

USPTO serial 79171136

NANOLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4948638Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 2016
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Koffsky

Mark I. Koffsky KOFFSKY SCHWALB LLC349 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 733NEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Industrial oils and greases; lubricants, namely, industrial lubricants; fuels, including motor spirit fuels; inorganic fullerene-like nanospheres and nanotubes used as solid lubricants and as agents in the nature of industrial lubricants to reduce friction, wear and temperature rise in contacting parts and used as non-chemical lubricant additives in oils and greases, and dry lubricant powder and lubricant coatingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 17, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 18, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 18, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 3, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 6, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance