Drawing for REAR CLOSURE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79171275

REAR CLOSURE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAR CLOSURE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josh A. Partington

JOSH A. PARTINGTON HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC11730 PLAZA AMERICA DR. #600RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; software to assist the opening of tailgatesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Lighting apparatus for vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Land vehicles; chassis and bumpers for automobiles; electric vehicles, namely, electric automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 6, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 12, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 29, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 29, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 29, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 4, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance